Welcome to the QE A2 PE Sport Psychology Blog!... Here you will find blog posts, articles, videos, screencasts, links & everything to do with the wonderful world of Sport Psych! Enjoy!
#makingmyelin

Monday, 30 September 2013
Friday, 27 September 2013
Achievement Motivation lesson summary
Need to Achieve (Nach) is the satisfaction in success,
whereas Need to Avoid Failure (Naf) is the shame experienced in failure... Both
motivate us
A performer with high Nach is confident, persistant,
approaches a challenge, enjoys feedback, is performance orientated, doesn’t
worry about failure and likes to play opponents of a similar level
A performer with high Naf lacks confidence, gives up easily,
avoids a challenge, hates feedback, is result orientated and likes to play
opponents much better or much worse than them.
Approach behaviour can be encouraged by ensuring success,
gradually increasing task difficulty, reinforcing success to improve self
efficacy, encouraging risk taking, setting challenging goals,
The situation can also motivate us. Probability of success is how likely victory is and
Incentive value of success is the reward gained from the victory. These 2
factors work together to influence how much the situation affects Achievement
Motivation. The most motivating situation is when Probability of Success is
50/50
Saturday, 21 September 2013
Personality Lesson 2 Summary
Profile of Mood States (Morgan) results showed elite performers to have an "Iceberg profile" with high scores in vigour and low scores in tension, depression, fatigue, confusion and anger compared to non-elite performers.
We can criticise this as it measures mood, not personality and mood is variable. also not all elite performers have the profile and some non-elite do have it. It is also not surprising performers who are high in tension, depression etc are not performing well. You can also use generic criticisms of questionnaires here.
Personality Profiling has 2 arguments - Credulous approach says it is useful as we can channel performers with certain traits to certain sports (e.g. calm, type B into golf); Sceptical approach says we shouldn't use profiling as other factors are more important (skill levels, physiology etc)
Social Learning Theory suggests the Environment determines behaviour and we adapt our behaviour due to the situation we are in. We learn this behaviour through 2 methods - modelling and reinforcement. We model other people (of high status or if they are similar to us) and if our actions are reinforced we are more likely to do it again.
Interactionist theory suggests personality is determined by an interaction of traits and environment (B=fPE) so is a combination of Trait theory and Social Learning theory. Therefore our behaviour is the same in a stable environment but will change if we change the environment.
Hollander put forward an Interactionist theory with 3 parts - Psychological core (traits), Typical Responses & Role related behaviour (Social Learning)
We can criticise this as it measures mood, not personality and mood is variable. also not all elite performers have the profile and some non-elite do have it. It is also not surprising performers who are high in tension, depression etc are not performing well. You can also use generic criticisms of questionnaires here.
Personality Profiling has 2 arguments - Credulous approach says it is useful as we can channel performers with certain traits to certain sports (e.g. calm, type B into golf); Sceptical approach says we shouldn't use profiling as other factors are more important (skill levels, physiology etc)
Social Learning Theory suggests the Environment determines behaviour and we adapt our behaviour due to the situation we are in. We learn this behaviour through 2 methods - modelling and reinforcement. We model other people (of high status or if they are similar to us) and if our actions are reinforced we are more likely to do it again.
Interactionist theory suggests personality is determined by an interaction of traits and environment (B=fPE) so is a combination of Trait theory and Social Learning theory. Therefore our behaviour is the same in a stable environment but will change if we change the environment.
Hollander put forward an Interactionist theory with 3 parts - Psychological core (traits), Typical Responses & Role related behaviour (Social Learning)
Sunday, 15 September 2013
Personality Lesson 1 Summary
Trait theory of Personality
Suggests personality is genetic / inherited / innate
Therefore is stable & enduring
Therefore behaviour is consistent or predictable
Methods of Measuring Personality
Questionnaires
Some advantages:
easy to administer
cheap to produce
produce lot of data
can be used anywhere
usually reliable
Some disadvantages:
Lack of validity as difficult to define what personality is
Misinterpretation of questions
Answers may not be truthful / provide socially desirable answers
Questions may not allow for full answers
biased questions
Situation when completed may not be ideal
Interview
Some advantages:
greater validity than questionnaires
can gather more detailed answers
Some disadvantages:
lower reliability due to different answers
depends on skill of interviewer to ask relevant questions & interpret answers
expensive and time consuming
Observation
Some advantages:
personality profile can be built up over period of time
high ecological validity as takes place in "real life"
Some disadvantages:
subjective
Reliant on skill of the observer
Time consuming / expensive / needs to be completed several times
Observer needs to know normal behaviour patterns of performer for comparison
May need several observers (at the same time)
If performer knows observation is occurring they may behave differently
Saturday, 7 September 2013
This article discusses lots of topics from Sport Psych intro lesson, inc nature v nurture, 10,000 hours & deliberate practice, myelin, growth mindset and luck! Are winners born or made?
This video shows Carol Dweck's work about Growth Mindset v Fixed Mindset as discussed in intro lesson
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)